Science in sports nutrition: do we need it?

Science in sports nutrition: do we need it?

It's long been an accepted fact that science in sports nutrition is essential. But like most accepted facts, this one's overdue a major rethink

Science has done some awesome stuff. 

It's put a man on the moon, mapped the human genome, banished a slew of now everyday diseases that used to kill in their thousands, and has ushered in technology today that makes recent science fiction actual reality. Science rocks. But science in sports nutrition? 

Well, not so much. 

Take a time machine back 20 years to look at ordinary sports nutrition, and all that's changed is the packaging.

Yet the science claims persist - these products are, to read their marketing, on the very bleeding edge of scientific possibility. 

In short, WTF?

Science in sports nutrition

Science has done some cool sh*t, like SpaceX's new generation of space rockets for example. It just hasn't done anything in sports nutrition 

Science in sports nutrition: it's all about psychology

The reason science in sports nutrition is such a big deal is psychology. 

Not the good kind of psychology that makes us better, stronger, faster or healthier, but rather the sort that helps companies sell more stuff and create a differentiation that doesn't exist between one product and another.

You know, like with shampoo or washing powder. 

We all love to think we're much smarter than to fall for what is little more than a con man's sleight of hand but, truth is, we are hardwired to lap this stuff up. 

The most famous experiment in this area came from psychologist Stanley Milgram at Yale University in 1963 who proved quite clearly that when influenced by the right authority, most ordinary people could be made to electrocute innocent people to death, simply because an authority figure told them to. No force was required. 

In Milgram's experiment, healthy and well-adjusted volunteers had to administer electric shocks to an unseen 'student' on the other side of a partition for each wrong answer they gave to questions the volunteers were given to ask. 

The student was not in reality connected to any current, and was played by an actor. 

The shocks started small and then increased, finally hitting 450 volts - fatal shocks can occur from as low as 110 volts...

65% of volunteers went all the way to 450 volts despite the student having long since gone from screaming and crying to being completely unresponsive.

The volunteers all wanted to stop, but the authority figure, an actor in a lab coat holding a clipboard simply requested they continue, because "the experiment demands it"

If authority as benign as this - a lab coat and a clipboard - can make people electrocute others because "they were told to", it can absolutely make you buy industrial and ineffective sugary crap in the name of sports nutrition. 

Science in sports nutrition: the authority factor and how it works

Deference to authority can be useful and we need it to survive - our brains have so many inputs to decipher daily that if we had to stop and think about every one, we'd barely make it out of bed.

The fact we function, thrive and achieve is entirely because, for many inputs, we have automatic responses so we don't have to think about what to do. We're on autopilot, which leaves us free to work on the big stuff.

Authority is a classic autopilot trigger, often a helpful one at that.

Science in sports nutrition 2

Authority can be useful, making our lives better & easier. It's when authority's hijacked that problems begin

As psychologist Robert Cialdini explains:

"Conforming to authority has genuine advantages. 

"Early on, these people (for example, parents, teachers) knew more than we did, and we found taking their advice proved [largely] beneficial... 

"As adults, the same benefits persist for the same reasons, though the authority figures now appear as employers, judges, and government leaders.

"Because their positions speak of superior access to information and power, it makes sense to comply with the wishes of properly constituted authorities".

Science is a massive authority.

From an early age we're taught about great scientific discoveries and achievements, about the intense intelligence and study required, and how it produces world changing geniuses like Einstein. 

Media and culture then reinforce our well-developed authority trigger for science, while newspaper, online and TV editors routinely demand science as the backing for any story on health and technology, further stoking the fire. 

Science in sports nutrition: how science got hijacked

This is all well and good, until someone decides to use our authority response to all things scientific against us. 

Make something look like science with graphs, confusing language, white coats, 'experts', laboratories and equations, and hey presto! You just created authority. 

Now you can use that authority to tell people they need the products that authority endorses, and watch them buy it. 

Here we're back in the world of shampoo, washing powder, and, yes, ordinary sports nutrition. 

Which is why otherwise smart and educated athletes find themselves chowing down product they don't even enjoy. 

The science said it was good after all. 

It's why otherwise smart and educated athletes persist with sports nutrition products that fail to deliver, or which even deliver obvious problems like stomach trouble, poor energy levels and delayed recovery. 

Because the science said it was good. 

It's why ordinary sports nutrition is still able to use the same cheap sweeteners and ingredients used in junk foods, and sell them as performance foods at a huge markup. 

A markup which then pays for more hokey science and around the circle goes, with everyone having a jolly old time. 

Apart from the athlete that is, who's just getting slower while feeling worse and worse. 

Science in sports nutrition 6

Knowing when to go with authority and when to blaze your own path is the key to powerful results

Science in sports nutrition: how to beat the bullsh*t

Fortunately there is a powerful tool we can all use against authority when it's being used against us, and it's this: 

Ask how the person using the authority stands to gain from our compliance with it.

Sports nutrition companies gain big time from your compliance with their science. 

Which is fine if you benefit too. That's a fair deal.

If you don't though and just feel a bit sick, or have a crappy race day experience, or don't enjoy the products involved then you've just been taken advantage of. 

The only response in this case is simple. 

Vote with your feet and wallet and avoid all products from any company that treats you this way. 

It's all they deserve. 

At 33Fuel we're not baffling you with bullsh*t, or making up wonky science to pull the wool over your eyes. 

Call us old fashioned, but we thought a sports nutrition company's job was to make the best possible products using the best possible ingredients. Which is all we do. After all, athletes like you are the lifeblood of our business and we want you happy, healthy, and above all - fast! 

33Shake natural sports nutrition

Looking for sports nutrition without all the bullsh*t? Head in store at

More performance-boosting content

From the 33Fuel Podcast

From the 33Fuel Vlog

Related content

How to avoid stomach trouble when running and during exercise

What Metallica can teach us about performance nutrition

Weight loss for athletes - best strategies, foods to avoid, motivation and more

Performance v health in sports nutrition and why it's the trade off you never need to make